Thanks for all the help - lots of good info found here, sorry it took so long to respond, working as much OT at work in order to buy a new system on either black friday, or cyber monday =)
Mystriss Freya: thanks for the tips, i have some concerns about the fan, but really, REALLY not in favor of a water-cooled system.
Raven & Valtyrian - thanks for the info on graphcs cards, this is the one part i'm worried ab out pricewise, and the first thing to be dropped in favor of price. I'm afraid i'm an NVIDIA guy though - untill ATI can give me anti-aliasing, i'm staying with NVIDIA, (Unless ati offers me some cool new games =D).
On the cpu: I was really looking at the 4 series itel chips untill i read this post on tom's hardware: (Sorry, forgot the original link, found this at break during work): (SOURCE: http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1698327/3770k-4770k.html)
8350rocks
June 9, 2013 12:18:33 PMcbrunnem said:
8350rocks said:
3770k is better. PERIOD.
There is no "future proof" with Intel, they change sockets every 18-24 months. Plus the rumor is Broadwell will be a BGA only setup. So you won't be able to upgrade from "Hasfail" to "Broadfail". Your next upgrade will be a new MB + CPU @ Skylake in 2015.
Might as well get IB over hasfail. All they did for hasfail was increase performance by 1% in gaming and increase power consumption systemwide, plus go to a new socket so you had to pay more to buy IB v2 err...hasfail.
Don't waste your money...buy the 3770k.
Honestly, if you're on a SB system right now of any kind I would recommend you sit out this cycle and just upgrade later. Your performance isn't that bad that anything newer is much better at all.
everything you said is completely wrong.
1. broadwell high end cpus have already been said to still be lga cpus.
2. at this point you could make a cpu 10% faster but in gaming most of the time the gpu is the weakest link so the cpu being faster will not show.
3. the power consumption increase is negligible at worst.
4. the 3770k is slower at everything compared to the 4770k
5. you are obviously bias and brain washed.
OP if you are starting from fresh get the 4770k and z87. its a little more but they both have the same negatives of upgrade future except that the z87 board still has the possibility to be compatible with the next cpu lines.
1.) LGA is not PGA. LGA = Socket 2011, Intel has stated they will continue to support extreme line in LGA format.
Socket 1150 is PGA (Pin Grid Array, the same AMD uses), and there will be no PGA Broadwell.
2.) So the GTX 680/HD7970s of the world bottleneck your CPU is what you're saying? Rubbish!! The CPU is a bottleneck for the GPU...not the other way around.
3.) It's greater than 10% more power consumption at load. (112W vs 100W)
4.) Actually, the 3770k is only slower by 1 second or fractions of a second in ANY CPU bound benchmark...check Tom's Review buddy. Plus, the i7-3770k overclocks WAY better, so at the high end, the 4770k is slower than the 3770k. PERIOD.
5.) You are obviously uninformed. Read up on the reviews.
OP: Buy the 3770k, it's the same chip with lower power consumption and better overclockability. You don't need a 4770k because a new socket is coming in 18-24 months any way.
Benchmarks:
3770k is faster at 3dmark graphics here:
Here it is 2 seconds slower...2 SECONDS!!!:
You can't even tell the difference in cryptography:
Memory bandwidth is better for the 3770k:
3 SECONDS difference in Photoshop:
15 seconds in blender:
6 seconds in file conversion:
8 seconds in MSVS:
0.2 seconds better in WinRAR:
3 seconds better at 7zip:
2 seconds in TCS:
Higher power consumption on 4770K:
Quote:
The Core i7-4770K, specifically, is a bit faster than the -3770K it replaces—but only because of IPC improvements. It runs at the same 3.5 GHz and sports the same four cores otherwise. HD Graphics 4600 are a small step up, but not significant enough to overtake AMD’s $130A10-5800K APU in any meaningful way. The vaunted Iris Pro Graphics 5200, with eDRAM, is currently reserved for BGA-based SKUs. And although it appears we received fairly overclockable samples of the -4770K, industry consensus amongst the companies with hundreds of these chips on-hand is that, at safe input voltages, 4.3 or 4.4 GHz should be OK. The luckiest enthusiasts might get 4.5 or 4.6 GHz. Skill won’t get you far; Haswell is all about luck of the draw due to its integrated voltage regulator.
So, for the second time in a week, we’re disappointed. Haswell has a lot to offer, just not to desktop enthusiasts. Intel’s attention is fully in the mobile space, and we can tell.
Remember back to December of 2011, when we published Intel Core i7-3930K And Core i7-3820: Sandy Bridge-E, Cheaper? I gave the -3930K our Best of Tom’s Hardware award. Although the Sandy Bridge-E-based part was $600 at the time, power users who bought one have been enjoying it for the last year and a half—and, at its stock clock rate, it’s still faster than a Core i7-4770K in threaded workloads. That might have saved you a $300+ upgrade on Ivy Bridge and now a complete platform overhaul for Haswell.
For those of you on Core i7-2700K or older,Core i7-4770K makes sense as part of a two- or three-year upgrade cycle. Otherwise, I see little reason to spend money on a desktop processor upgrade, a new motherboard, and a compliant power supply. Save those few hundred dollars and put them toward a Haswell-based convertible, perhaps (or something based on Temash, if AMD’s partners can show us a compelling platform). In the meantime, we’ll be waiting on a manifestation of Haswell that more accurately shows off the spirit of Intel’s efforts.
Tom's review of it says exactly what I am saying...DON'T BUY HASFAIL!
EDIT: FULL DISCLOSURE: I am a game developer and specialize in hardware. This is what I do for a living...compare architecture and flaws and how it translates into performance.
any further discussion would be appreciated =D My friends say i'm buying/building an overpriced pc, but i want a system that will chew through gw2 and eq next/landmark and ask "was that IT?" XD
....I also don't want to upgrade my pc for the next 5-10 years......
Thanks Again!
» Edited on: 2013-11-12 18:33:01